Foursquare Soars Thanks to Facebook Places

Clipped from www.adotas.com

When Facebook Places, the long-awaited location-based mobile piece of the social Goliath, arrived the other week, the tech and mainstream media alike was a-buzz about the “Foursquare killer.” Only thing is Facebook had already said that Places would integrate data from the likes of Foursquare and Gowalla — executives from those services were actually at the public launch. Dave Marsey, senior vice president of media at Digitas, wisely suggested that although Facebook was bringing massive scale (the polite term for 500 million users) into the space, it wasn’t going to slay Foursquare and other networks, but lead the path ahead for mobile social.

“Places will put pressure on [location-based mobile social networks] to share more insights/data given Facebook’s 500 million user footprint and gives Facebook huge clout in setting the future strategy/direction for location based services,” he said.

Since the launch of Facebook Places, Foursquare has had nearly half a million signups, leaping from 2.6 million pre-Places to just 3 million last week. Apparently the company was expecting to hit that milestone in early September.

As the four days after the Places announcement marked Foursquare’s biggest growth spurt ever, Silicon Alley Insider makes this deduction:

“Mainstream media outlets deemed Places worthy of their attention. Virtually all of them described the service as a ‘Foursquare-killer.’ This left readers wondering: ‘what the hell is Foursquare?’ So they looked Foursquare up in Google, and many of these readers started an account.”

We digital folks world are so consumed in our world of apps and smartphones, we forget the American public isn’t always up to date with the latest marvels of technology. However, considering how much mainstream coverage Foursquare in particular has received (as well as a brutally hilarious Onion piece), I don’t think location-based mobile social networks were that much of a mystery.

At a cafe recently, I was joking with a industry guy about checking in on Foursquare (I think I’ve checked in four places total — I kinda like being at undisclosed locations.) and the barista overheard and asked if she could see the app. She’d heard about it but had never seen it in action, so I checked in and showed her the mayor of the cafe — “Oh yeah, she gets soy lattes here all the time,” the barista replied.

My guess is, like my barista, people knew about Foursquare and it’s location-based ilk, but Facebook Places legitimized it, made it safe for the masses. “I dunno about this location-based social networking — oh wait, Facebook’s got it? Well maybe it’s OK, I’ll set me up an account, hee hee hee. Check in at trendy bar… Oh wow, I got me a badge already!”

At an Ogilvy-hosted chummy panel discussion of location-based mobile social networks that included representatives from Foursquare, Buzzd, Loopt and BrightKite, I asked if it was feasible for so many moso networks to coexist — sure, the sector was in its infancy, but weren’t they going to start bumping shoulders as more mobile users checked in?

The general sentiment held that it was great how many different options mobile users had and they saw such diversity thriving in the future. In fact, as Places was still gathering speed on the rumor mill at the time, the participants were anticipating Facebook’s entry and excited about the attention it would bring the space. Seems pretty prescient now.

Interestingly, one moso guy expressed his displeasure that Facebook is akin to the Roman Empire of the online world — shouldn’t there be more competition? We can always wonder if News Corp. hadn’t bought MySpace and squeezed every dime of cheap display revenue instead of improving network functionality, would the two still be rivals? MySpace’s new layout and design changes are a bit too close to Facebook for comfort, but what if the network had made such changes years ago — when they would have been relevant?

Coulda, woulda, shoulda… MySpace’s ad revenue keeps sinking — it looks like the iceberg penetrated one hull too many. So we turn to the new challengers: Diaspora, with its ambitious approach to data privacy, and Google Me, which has piqued curiosity across the Internet.

However, on the mobile-social front, the population is already pretty mixed, and it appears the diverse ecosystem is going to survive for a while.

Read more at www.adotas.com

 

Too many disclose sensitive information on social networks

Social networking users should be careful when accepting friend requests and to be conscious of the data they share.

According to a new study by BitDefender, social network users do not appear to be preoccupied with the real identity of the people they meet online or about the details they disclose while chatting with total strangers.

The study revealed that 94 percent of those asked to “friend” the test profile, an unknown, attractive young woman, accepted the request without knowing who the requester really was.

The study sample group included 2,000 users from all over the world registered on one of the most popular social networks. These users were randomly chosen in order to cover different aspects: sex (1,000 females, 1,000 males), age (the sample ranged from 17 to 65 years with a mean age of 27.3 years), professional affiliation, interests etc.

In the first step, the users were only requested to add the unknown test profile as their friend, while in the second step several conversations with randomly selected users aimed to determine what kind of details they would disclose.

The study showed:

  • More than 86 percent of the users who accepted the test-profile’s friend request work in the IT industry, of which 31 percent work in IT Security
  • The most frequent reason for accepting the test profile’s friend request was her “lovely face” (53 percent)
  • After a half an hour conversation, 10 percent disclosed personal sensitive information, such as: address, phone number, mother’s and father’s name, etc – information usually requested as answers to password recovery questions
  • Two hours later, 73 percent siphoned what appears to be confidential information from their workplace, such as future strategies, plans, as well as unreleased technologies/software.

Read more at www.net-security.org

 

Twitter Moves to OAuth: The OAuthcalypse Is Nigh

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

 

Twitter is killing support for basic user authentication in third-party apps on Tuesday morning, the company says. Instead, Twitter will now require all third-party app developers to use OAuth for user authentication.

This is a planned move Twitter first announced in December, and the company has posted a help page on its developer site with some resources meant to ease the transition to OAuth.

The Twitter API team has been dialing down the number of requests an app can make using the basic authorization method. That number will hit zero at 8AM Pacific time Tuesday.

Some bloggers have given the event the catchy name, “OAuthcalypse” — a bit of a mouthful, but so is “user authentication protocol” — the implication being that when basic authentication is switched off, it will break old software and leave users in the dark. But since Twitter has given developers ample warning of the change, the switch will only lock out a small number of apps.

Twitter’s move mirrors a broader trend on the social web, where basic authentication is being ditched for the more secure OAuth when services and applications connect user’s accounts.

In basic authentication, a website or app will say, “Hey, do you want to share whatever you’re doing here with your friends on Twitter? Give me your Twitter username and password and I’ll hook up your accounts.” By passing along your info, you’re giving that app or website unlimited access to everything in your Twitter account. Pretty dangerous, and not secure.

In OAuth authentication, the website or app will send you to Twitter where you sign yourself in, then Twitter will tell the website or app “Yeah, they are who they say they are.” The website or app only gains the ability to do certain things with your account — post, read, reply, search — while staying locked out from the more sensitive stuff.

Read more at www.wired.com

 

2 of 8151231020...Last »


elsewhere


DandyID Delicious Flickr ClaimID Soup (Soup-Tacular) Amplify Visualizeus Google Profile Posterous StumbleUpon (Morgaine) PeoplePond Twitter Clipmarks YouTube 43 People 43 Places 43 Things 30 Boxes Bloglines Brightkite Chimp CoComment FriendFeed Newsvine Vox Jaiku Multiply My OpenID Tumblr (Morgaine) DeviantArt TypeKey Technorati Wakoopa Facebook LinkedIn Plurk LastFm Kaboodle Netvibes MySpace MyBlogLog Google Reader Disqus Icq LibraryThing Shelfari Simpy AllConsuming Colourlovers Digg 43 Marks Squidoo Blip Fm Dipity Diigo Mixx Koornk Blogger Plinky Libre Fm Card.ly Getsatisfaction Goodreads 12 Seconds 97 Bottles Big Think You are My Mashable Flixster Vimeo Veoh Weheartit Reddit Identi.ca  Facebook Page