Face the enemy – wrong information

I stumbled upon a book review. It’s a review of the book ‘While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam Is Destroying the West from Within’, and the title of the review is ‘Europe must awaken, face the enemy — itself’. One paragraph caught my eye:

Some individuals, Bawer says, have indeed recognized the truth — and have been assassinated for speaking it. He tells us about the effort of people like Theo van Gogh, Pim Fortuyn and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, all of whom were murdered.

Yes, according to the reviewer, one John F. Fink, Ayaan Hirsi Ali was murdered. Mister Fink is apparently an ‘Indianapolis author and journalist’. Now I don’t know whether the book itself also claims that Ayaan Hirsi Ali was murdered, but the journalist nevertheless should have checked the facts. I doubt Ayaan Hirsi Ali enjoys reading she was murdered.

Truth is she has received dead threats. Now, even though personally I think the way in which she tries to achieve her goals, might perhaps not always be the most efficient way, and personal issues seem to interfere on more than one occasion, no one deserves getting death threats, not to mention getting murdered.

On the other hand, the Muslim community shouldn’t be seen as a homologous entity. There the review is wrong, again.

Unlike immigrants to the United States, Bawer says, Muslims in Europe do not integrate themselves into society. They insist on following sharia, or Islamic law, and they go to extremes.

Without a doubt there are certain Muslims that would love for the shari’a to be followed and the separation between church and state abolished. Question is what shari’a entails. There is tremendous variance in the interpretation and implementation of Islamic law in Muslim societies today. Like Jewish law and Christian canon law, Islamic law is interpreted differently by different people in different times and places. In the hands of moderates, religious law can be moderate and even liberal. In the hands of post-Enlightenment readers of philosophy, religious law becomes associated mainly with ritual, theology, or history and no longer regulates society or the state. In the hands of fundamentalists, however, it is legally binding on all people of the faith and even on all people who come under their control. All Muslims might follow Islamic law, yet their view of the law varies as much as individual Muslims vary.

There are other mistakes as well.

Muslim girls are often forced to undergo female genital mutilation and to enter into arranged marriages.

I’ve written my thesis about female genital mutilation (or, with a less negative connotation, female circumcision) and the practise certainly isn’t part of mainstream Islam on an international scale.is It is performed by Muslims and non-Muslims alike across East Africa and the Nile Valley, as well as parts of the Arabian peninsula and Southeast Asia. In both areas, the custom predates Islam. Many African Muslims believe that female circumcision is required by Islam, but a large number of Muslims believe this practice has no basis in Islam. Nevertheless it is justified on religious grounds (among possible other justifications) both by Muslims and Christians who practise it, mostly in parts of Africa.

Arranged marriage is still the most common form of marriage in several countries in South Asia, in particular India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. It crosses boundaries of religion, culture and caste, practiced by Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Jew and Muslims alike. It is practiced to a lesser extent in tribal and rural areas in parts of the Middle East. It used to be the norm in urban areas as well, but is vanishing quickly from there. It was also common in South Korea, China, and Japan, but is now rapidly diminishing in these countries.

In Europe some marriages are still arranged. The notion that a marriage should be based on love isn’t universal. Arranged marriages operate on the notion that marriages are primarily an economic union or a means to have children. It sees relationships as defined on the basis of economic dimensions on which social-sexual relationships would be based and defined. Be careful though not to confuse an arranged marriage with a forced marriage. The two aren’t necessarily the same !

Victims of rape are sometimes killed in “honor killings” because of the attitude that girls are at fault; over a six-month period in 2004-2005, 11 women were victims of honor killings in The Hague alone.

The above, again, is wrong information. Yes, honour killings do happen. But to my best knowledge not 11 in a 6 month period in the city of The Hague alone. A report by the Hague police unit ‘Haaglanden’ revealed that each month at least one person in the Netherlands died as a consequence of violence by family members. Due to honour killings 11 people died in the previous year. (Source)

Anyway, if you want to read the article for yourself, I made a screenshot, just click the image below. I think the point of view of both the reviewer and the author of the book, is perfectly clear.

Wrong information

3 comments to Face the enemy – wrong information

  • Robyn F

    Check out this detailed WSJ article re Ms. Hirshi’s treatment by Dutch authorities and citizents since Mr. Van Gogh’s assassination.

  • Update: Ayaan Hirshi Ali can’t deal with the fact she told lies during her asylum procedure, and she is now fleeing to the United States -> link

  • This is a case where it looks like the author took their info from a lot of faulty sources without fact-checking. A simple search using Google could have led the author to the wikipedia entry for Ayaan Hirsi Ali, where he would have, no doubt, discovered she is very much alive. You also rightly point out the errors the author makes regarding making broad generalizations of cultural practices that are by no means as widespread as he’d like to think.

    Good catch on the errors. :)

Additional comments powered by BackType



quote

All those who try to unveil the mysteries always have tragic lives. At the end they are always punished. — Anaïs Nin

consider this …

"Artistic creation is not born ex nihilo from the brains of individuals as a private language; it has always been a social practice. Ideas are not original, they are built upon layers of knowledge accumulated throughout history. Out of these common layers, artists create works that have their unmistakable specificities and innovations. All creative works reassemble ideas, words and images from history and their contemporary context."

"Only after the invention of the creative genius, practices of collaboration, appropriation and transmission were actively forgotten."

"Copyright pits author against author in a war of competition for originality – its effects are not only economic, it also naturalizes a certain process of knowledge production, delegitimates the notion of a common culture, and cripples social relations. Artists are not encouraged to share their thoughts, expressions and works or to contribute to a common pool of creativity. Instead, they jealously guard their “property” from others, who they view as potential competitors, spies and thieves lying in wait to snatch and defile their original ideas. This is a vision of the art world created in capitalism’s own image, whose ultimate aim is to make it possible for corporations to appropriate the alienated products of its intellectual workers."

"The private ownership of ideas over the last two centuries hasn't managed to completely eradicate the memory of a common culture or the recognition that knowledge flourishes when ideas, words, sounds and images are free for everyone to use."

The above from: Copyright, Copyleft & the Creative Anti-Commons

I don't want to exploit anyone's labor. Images and texts were mostly taken from the Internet and are usually linked to where I found them. These images and texts have touched me in one way or another, they've inspired me, made me think, served as a basis for the writing of poetry, etc. If you insist I take one such image or text you consider to be yours and yours only down, contact me, and I might. I'd prefer you to consider my blogging the image or text as a token of recognition, admiration or appreciation though.